Have you ever been to a store, seen a kid crying
because a parent wouldn’t buy him or her a toy, only to have the parent cave to
shut the spoiled little brat up? Then, as soon as the kid gets what it wants,
it is happy until the next aisle, and it sees another glimmering, taunting object
that it must possess. Well, welcome to the
fallout of the most recent NHL Lockout. If it were a Broadway production, it
would look like this:
Playing the part of the spoiled brat kid that no one likes: The
Players
Playing the part of the helpless parent who is trying desperately
to calm and please an undeserving child: The NHL
Playing the part of the innocent bystander watching helplessly
shaking his head: the fans, and everyone reading this post.
Scene I: After losing out on a whole entire NHL
season, players are satisfied and owners can cope with the result of lockout. (Enter greedy NHL Players a few years later) “For
some reason, I think the rise in the salary cap gives me full entitlement for a
huge, front loaded, long term salary that won’t work out in the end. But that’s
ok, because even if I get bought out 6 years into my 12 year, 60 million dollar
deal, I have still managed to make 40 million of it. And I get paid about 12
for doing nothing. Because I deserve it. Why? Because I do something I love for
a living.”
(Enter
dumb NHL GM’s and owners) Sounds good greedy NHL players. If
this is what it takes to get you on our teams so we can still have a marketable
asset in our portfolio, lets sign the papers!”
The cast members then live in harmony for the next
few years. Until the expiration of the CBA. Uh oh, trouble on the horizon.
Scene II: (Enter
NHLPA, NHL Owners) Owners: “we messed up. We are paying you too much. We wish
to pay you less and shave some money off of your salaries. Also, we wish
receive a higher percentage of the money made off the products we own and you
do not.”
Players: What!?!?! Not a chance! You signed us to
those deals and we are fully entitled! And we deserve more money than you from
the jerseys, hats, ect that you sell! Even though we just work for you!”
Owners: “But that would be like paying a worker at a
grocery store 60 cents for every $1 tomato gets sold”
Players: “we know.”
At this point of the play, everything is open to
interpretation on both sides. Each side has fair and equal points. The CBA gets
signed, the season is half lost, and play resumes.
Scene III: (Enter
players, owners) Owner: The salary cap is going down next year. In order to
keep you on our team, we will have to pay you the same as last year, or less.
Player: What!? I scored 15 goals last year and we
missed the playoffs! I must have MORE! Because 4.5 million dollars a year isn’t
good enough! (Player breaks 4th
wall and turns to crowd) “You there, what do you do for a living?”
Crowd Member: “I am a surgeon sir.”
Player: “Oh. So you have a definite use to society
and without trained people such as yourself, many undeserving people would die.
You are a hero and mean a great deal to the world.”
Crowd Member: “I guess so”
Player: “Well I am in the NHL. I make 4.5 million
dollars to play a sport and serve no real purpose to society, especially not in
the way you do. And I make millions more per year than you!” (Turns to owner) “My 4.5 million dollars
is not good enough. I demand 5.3 or I walk! Because I am an NHLer.”
Scene IV: (Owner’s
Office) Mr. Letang. I noticed that your contract is running out soon. You
made $3.5M last year, and scored 5 goals. We feel your play has improved over
the past few years so we would like to offer you a raise. How does $5M per year
sound for 7 years?”
Mr. Letang: “*scoff* That is INSULTING! Only 5
million dollars? To play a game I love, have access to the greatest sports physiotherapists,
trainers, strength and conditioning coaches, nutritionists, and facilities in
the world? No! I will test the free agent market until somebody presents me
with a number that I feel I deserve! Good day sir!”
Owner: “Ok Mr. Letang. You are vital to our team. Here
is $7.25M. But can you score more than an average of 11 goals next year?
Scene IV, act II: The Office of the Tampa Bay Lightning) Owner: Vinny, we messed up your
contract. We are going to use a buyout on you. Sorry. Here is 32 million
dollars over the next 14 years for doing nothing.
Lecavalier then proceeds find 3 teams who are
willing to use his services. After an average cap hit of 4 million dollars per
year is proposed by one team, Lecavalier turns them down. After his demands are
too high for the 2nd team, he walks away as well. Lecavalier then
manages to find someone to pay him 4.5 million more dollars per year. Upon announcing
this to the audience, the surgeon in the crowd has a heart attack. No one can
save him because no one has hundreds of thousands of dollars to go through the
training it takes for those abilities. Meanwhile, while his family grieves and
wonders how the bills are going to be paid, all over the league in the
offseason, millionaire hockey players continue to cry out and demand more
millions upon millions to play a game 9 months out of the year.
Scene V: The set shifts to the grocery store. The
child who was at first crying and whining because he wasn’t getting what he
felt he deserved, is now sitting in the shopping cart, toy in hand, with a big
smile on his face. His cheeks are still red from screaming, his eyes are still
swollen from crying. But he has his toy. All is well for now. Until the next
aisle.
The parent, feeling sheepish for giving in, but just
wanted to continue shopping without hassle, quietly pushes the shopping cart
along. A blank, solemn stare radiates from their face. The child is playing
with the toy. All that can be heard is the sound of the cart wheels rolling
along the marble floor. And the sound of the child laughing.
Fin
No comments:
Post a Comment
Now that you are part of the fast growing Avaholics Unanimous Family, we would love to hear from our readers. We will do our best to answer back. Thanks for reading! For blog updates, follow us on twitter at @Avaholics_U.