This
string of three point games is killing every team stuck in the potential fun
and excitement of the Western Conference playoff race; The Avs included. Here
is a look at the current Western Conference standings in comparison to what
they would look like if teams didn’t get a point for losing. The head honchos
at NBC Sports, and the guys who pick teams for the Winter Classic may want to
close their browsers now, as there are no mentions of anything Eastern
Conference. Hockey Blasphemy anyone?
(By the way, we are aware of the awkward alignment on different browers, we'll see what we can do about fixing it)
(By the way, we are aware of the awkward alignment on different browers, we'll see what we can do about fixing it)
Current Western Conference
Standings
Standings
Without the Loser Point
Team PTS
Team PTS
1.
St. Louis Blues 103 1. St. Louis Blues 94
2.
Vancouver Canucks 98 2. Vancouver Canucks 90
3.
Dallas Stars 87 3.
Dallas Stars 82
4. Nashville Predators 96 4. Detroit Red Wings 90
5. Detroit Red Wings 95 5. Nashville Predators 88
6.
Chicago Blackhawks 92 6.
Chicago Blackhawks 84
7.
Phoenix Coyotes 87 7. Colorado Avalanche 80
8. LA Kings 86 8. San Jose Sharks 76
9.
San Jose Sharks 86 9. LA Kings 74
10. Colorado Avalanche 86 10. Phoenix Coyotes 74
11.
Calgary Flames 83 11. Calgary Flames 68
12.
Anaheim Ducks 75 12. Anaheim Ducks 64
13.
Minnesota Wild 72 13. Minnesota Wild 61
14.
Edmonton Oilers 71 14. Edmonton Oilers 62
15.
Columbus Blue Jackets 55 15. Columbus Blue Jackets 48
As you
can see, seeds 1-4 and 11-15 do not change with the removal of the loser point.
The situations change however. The Red Wings are only 2 points back of the
Blues for the Central Division lead, and the Dallas Stars have an 6 point
advantage over the San Jose Sharks and an 8 point lead on Phoenix Coyotes in
the Pacific Division without the loser point. In today's NHL, Dallas and
Phoenix are tied with 87 points. The only thing keeping the Coyotes out of the
lead is the fact that Dallas has played 1 fewer game. San Jose is also close to
the division lead now, trailing by only one point.
There is
also a minor difference in the 4th and 5th seeds. The Predators currently have a 1 point lead on the Detroit
Red Wings, but in the second column, without the loser point, Detroit still
leads by 2 points. Extra breathing room for the Red Wings
would be huge. Home ice advantage in the Joe Louis Arena is a great advantage.
The real
difference occurs with seeds 6-10. LA and Phoenix currently occupy the 7th
and 8th seeds in the West, with Colorado and San Jose looking in
from the outside. The roles are completely reversed in the revised standings.
Colorado and San Jose sit in 7th and 8th respectively,
and the Coyotes and Sharks find themselves out of the playoffs, with a larger
point margin.
The
biggest change, and we’re not just saying that because this is an Avs blog,
comes at the hands of the Avalanche. The Avalanche are currently in 10th
spot in the Western Conference, with their schedule fighting against them. They
are only 1 point out of the playoffs, but they have the least remaining games.
In the second column, the Avs are in a more comfortable 7th place,
and have a 6 point lead on 9th place Los Angeles. They have a 4
point lead on San Jose in 8th, and are only 4 points back of the
Phoenix Coyotes for 6th spot in the conference. The difference is
huge in the eyes of the Avalanche. It
will be fun to see how the standings play out at the end of the year, as it
always is, and it will be fun to see how much the loser point can influence who
makes or misses the playoffs. Wouldn’t it be something if a team won the
Stanley Cup after making the playoffs because of accumulated loser points?
I love this! I was posting on my twitter the other day, to who I thought was pretty much myself, that the NHL needs to do away with the OTL, only rewarding a 1 point loss to SOL. Phoenix, at the time I looked (to lazy to look now) was at a W/L under .500, in 7th place, and ahead of two teams with a W/L at or over .500, due to their MASSIVE amount of OTL. So thank you for posting it for more to see. I think it is watering down hockey and is a problem that needs to be addressed. Losing a Shootout is nothing to be embarrassed about and should warrant a point, as made clear last night when two goalies pitched a shutout. Losing in OT is no different then losing in regulation. My changes - Extend OT to 8 minutes and drop the 1 point rewarded to losing.
ReplyDeleteWe definitley agree! And those aren't bad changes you've though up. 8 minutes of OT would be intense!
Deletehttp://www.topcheesehockey.com/32/post/2011/11/should-the-nhl-adopt-a-new-scoring-system.html
ReplyDeleteThis is interesting. The system of today is supporting the defensive teams. You can play defensivly, take one point and then win an extra point in the shoot out. That can't be the thought from the beginning.
ReplyDeleteMy idea, as I'm from Sweden, is to do like we do in our Swedish Elite Series.
Regular win: 3p
OT win: 2p
OT loss: 1p
Regular loss: 0p
By this way you get rewarded by an offensive way of playing and the standings would change more rapidly. A winning streak would give you a boost up while a losing sterak would give you the same effect but downwards. It would have been nice to see how the conferences would have looked like if it all was like this.